skip to main content

U.S. Department of Labor Issues Final Overtime Rule

Overtime Final Rule

On September 24, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued its Final Overtime Rule (Final Rule) which raises the minimum salary threshold for “executive,” “administrative,” and “professional,” (EAP) employees from $455 per week ($23,660 per year) to $684 per week ($35,568 per year) to qualify as exempt from overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The DOL estimates that the Final Rule, which will become effective on January 1, 2020, will extend overtime pay eligibility to 1.3 million workers. The salary threshold in the Final Rule is nearly identical to the $679 per week proposed earlier this year by the DOL.

Under current DOL regulations, an employee can qualify as an exempt executive, administrative or professional employee if: 

  1. The employee is paid on a salary basis (the “salary basis test”);
  2. The employee’s salary meets a minimum specified salary amount (the “salary level test”); and
  3. The employee’s duties meet the criteria set forth in the regulations (the “duties test”).

The Final Rule addresses the salary level test only and does not alter the salary basis test or the duties test. The Final Rule also allows for up to ten (10) percent of an employee’s salary to come from nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments so long as those forms of compensation are paid, at a minimum, on an annual basis. The Final Rule increases the annual compensation threshold from $100,000 to $107,432 for employees to qualify for the Highly Compensated Employee exemption (which is far less than what was proposed by the DOL earlier this year). The DOL’s Final Rule also revises the salary levels for workers in U.S. territories and in the motion picture industry.

Notably absent from the Final Rule is any specific requirement that the regulations be updated on a specific schedule. Rather, the DOL indicated in one of the guidance documents issued with the Final Rule (https://www.dol.gov/whd/overtime2019/overtime_FAQ.htm#8) that “[t]he Department believes such a commitment could deprive the Department of flexibility to adapt to unanticipated circumstances, and believes that prevailing economic conditions, rather than fixed timelines, should drive future updates.”

As employers well remember, in 2016 the Obama Administration’s DOL announced a final rule (“2016 Rule”), which set the minimum salary level at $913 per week ($47,476 per year) and required automatic triennial increases to the minimum salary threshold. Dozens of states and business groups requested a nationwide injunction blocking the 2016 Rule from taking effect, which was granted. After the change in administrations and while the case was on appeal, the DOL asked the Fifth Circuit to hold the case in abeyance while the DOL issued a new proposed rule.

When the 2016 Rule was announced by the Obama Administration, some employers chose to increase employee salaries in an effort to maintain their exempt status. For those employers, the Final Rule will not alter their employees’ exempt status under the FLSA. Employers who did not make changes to comply with the 2016 Rule (or who initially made changes and then pulled them back after the 2016 Rule was enjoined) must again consider whether to increase employee salaries or re-classify employees who earn below the newly proposed threshold and meet the other criteria to qualify for exempt status.

Implementation of the Final Rule and Tips for Employers

  • For EAP employees currently classified as exempt and earning close to the new salary threshold, employers may choose to increase the salary level to maintain exempt status (especially where the employee works substantially more than 40 hours per week).
  • In contrast, employees making less than $35,568 likely will be reclassified as non-exempt. For those employees, employers will need to assess how much (if any) overtime the newly reclassified employees likely will work and determine an hourly wage rate or salary for those employees taking into account those estimates.
  • Employers should consider the impact of the Final Rule generally, assessing its impact not only on individual employees and departments but more broadly looking at its effect on workflow and business operations.
  • For organizations that have a significant number of exempt employees currently earning less than $684 per week, compliance with the Final Rule will potentially have ripple effects throughout the organization, impacting the work of both exempt and non-exempt employees.
  • Given the January 1, 2020, effective date of the Final Rule, employers should analyze the associated impact on their businesses and begin the process of making any needed modifications immediately.
     

About the Author

Andrea M. Kirshenbaum is the Chair of the Firm's Wage and Hour Practice Group, a Principal in its Employment & Employee Relations Practice Group, and a member of the Firm's Appellate Department. She defends employers nationally in federal and state court litigation involving all major employment statutes, represents them in related government investigations, and counsels them proactively on compliance with these statutes.

Read more >